HD-Vinyls 24/96 (DGG) H. Berlioz – Requiem (Munch)

Reposted, now with FF links
Charles Munch died in 1968, the year this Berlioz Requiem appeared. Munich is an unlikely place to look for Berlioz, but in several ways this remake is better than the original release with the BSO from 1960. Although only eight years separates the two, DG’s sound is considerably cleaner and more vivid than RCA’s.

# Composer: Hector Berlioz
# Performer: Peter Schreier
# Orchestra: Bavarian Radio Symphony Orchestra
# Conductor: Charles Munch
# Vinyl (1967)

# Number of Discs: 2
# Format: Flac
# Label: Deutsche Grammophon Gesellschaft
# DR-Analysis: DR 14
# Size: 1.41 GB
# Scan: yes
# Server: FileFactory


There’s also a major advantage in the choral singing; the Mew England Conservatory chorus was musical and enthusiastic, but they sounded too young and light-voiced. The Bavarian Radio Chorus sounds professional from start to finish. And the young, perfectly secure Peter Schreier is compelling in the treacherous Sanctus; so was Leopold Simoneau in the Boston version.

The most telling difference, however, has to do with Munch himself, who simply sounds old and tired here. It would be hard to imagine a more melanchily Kyrie to open the work, not so much summoning Christ as mourning him. Even the Hosanna in the Sanctus is downbeat. Tempos are slack throughout, and although Munch’s phrasing is accomplished and sensitive, the sensational side of this epic work, which Berlioz intended to arouse awe and terror in his listeners, isn’t really present. The forces involved also sound too small in scale, whereas the composer envisioned a titanic assemblage (the only close approximation I know of comes from Bernstein’s live reading on Sony, recorded at Lees Invalides in Paris where the premiere took place, but it has sonic limitations).

It’s regrettable that the preeminent Berlioz conductor of the Fifties and early Sixties never made a totally satisfying Requiem, but that’s the case. Frankly, for DG to foist this off as some kind of classic takes nerve, considering that they’ve been peddling it at budget price off and on for years.


A1   Requiem And Kyrie 11:29
A2   Dies Irae 12:25
B1   Quid Sum Miser 3:25
B2   Rex Tremendae 5:39
B3   Quaerens Me 4:43
C1   Lacrymosa 10:24
C2   Offertorium 8:20
C3   Hostias 3:20
D1   Sanctus 11:09
D2   Agnus Dei 11:45

Analyzed folder: /96kHecBer_Req_Mu/96k Berlioz – Requiem – Munch
DR        Peak        RMS        Filename
DR16        -1.16 dB     -24.30 dB     A1 Berlioz Requiem – Kyrie.wav
DR13        -0.00 dB     -17.91 dB     A2 Berlioz Requiem – Dies Irae-Tuba Mirum.wav
DR14        -17.53 dB     -37.14 dB     B1 Berlioz Requiem – Quid Sum Miser.wav
DR13        -0.33 dB     -18.63 dB     B2 Berlioz Requiem – Rex Tremendae.wav
DR14        -9.88 dB     -30.40 dB     B3 Berlioz Requiem – Quaerens Me.wav
DR13        -0.09 dB     -17.15 dB     C1 Berlioz Requiem – Lacrymosa.wav
DR16        -6.65 dB     -29.17 dB     C2 Berlioz Requiem – Domine Jesu Christe.wav
DR15        -9.59 dB     -30.24 dB     C3 Berlioz Requiem – Hostias.wav
DR14        -2.17 dB     -21.33 dB     D1 Berlioz Requiem – Sanctus.wav
DR18        -1.54 dB     -26.94 dB     D2 Berlioz Requiem – Agnus Dei.wav
Number of files:    10

Official DR value:    DR14


  • Composed By – Hector Berlioz
  • Conductor – Charles Munch
  • Orchestra – Chor Und Sinfonie-Orchester Des Bayerischen Rundfunks
  • Tenor Vocals – Peter Schreier

Ripping Infos

  • RCM: Okki Nokki (L’art du son, Clearaudio’s Diamond Cleaner)
  • TT: Clearaudio Champion Level II
  • Cartridge: Limited Edition Denon DL103 SA
  • Phono amp: Pro-Ject Phono Box II
  • Pre Amp: Unison Research Unico Pre (Tube)
  • Finals: Opera Consonance 9.9 Mono (Tube)
  • Speakers: Dali Helikon 400
  • Connections: MIT Terminator, Audioquest Emerald, Audioquest Quartz
  • Software: iZotope RX Advanced v2.02, Adobe Audition CS 5.5, Twisted Wave 1.9
  • Light de-Clicking with iZotope, significant clicks manually removing, no De-Noising

If You hear some clicks and pops here and there, Who cares?
Id rather have a few light anomalies instead of destroying the music. Enjoy the music, not the ticks & pops.

  • DR-Analisys before converting to Flac
  • Converting Wave -> Flac: Twisted Wave 1.9
  • Artwork: Sony Alpha 350, Epson Perfection V750 Pro, Photoshop CS 5.5

If you like what i do, please consider that a little donation would be very appreciate.
I reinvest all donations in maintenance of my rig, for purchasing cleaning solutions and, most important of all, purchasing of new vinyls.

Click on the “Donate”-button. Thank you very much !

Download from FileFactory
4 archives
PW: LaWally

13 thoughts on “HD-Vinyls 24/96 (DGG) H. Berlioz – Requiem (Munch)

  1. As already stated in your Verdi’s Requiem post: a heartfelt thank you. Another great Requiem. He who does not know this is one who should hurry now!

  2. Hello
    Part 2 : ”The server hosting this file is temporarily unavailable due to system maintenance”
    Can you re-upload this file please

    • What does it means, what you’ve written? Is the file unavailable or just for now (due to maintenance) not available?
      10 points for you, if you guess it right 😉

      • 🙂 Sure it is ”due to maintenance” and I understand it’s NOT your fault, but last time FF had ”system maintenance” the files were not available for several months. So should I just wait ?
        TY Rach for all your uploads. You are doing a GREAT job. LOVE your site.
        I am sorry for the inconvenience.

        • Oh FREUND, nicht diese Töne, sondern lass uns angenehmere anstimmen…. 😉
          Don’t write “sorry”…there is no inconvenience on my site, be sure. I wanted to hold the answer to you in a funny manner to underline, there is not too much I can do. You’re right, sometime the files that are under maintenance vanish…but not always. Indeed it’s really seldom.

          OK, let’s wait some days, OK? Then, if necessary, tell me again and I will help.

          • 🙂 I do not speak German, but Beethoven is one of my favorite composers.
            By inconvenience, I meant by my pestering, not towards your site. As I said before, your site is awesome, and I appreciate the work that you do.

Leave a Reply